People are holding onto old iPhones for longer.
- Apple faces exactly the same problem with the iPhone as it did with the iPad — people are hanging onto older models for longer.
- That's a problem for Apple's profits and stock price as long as the company primarily relies on selling hardware.
- A leading Apple analyst thinks the company could make its stock more valuable by becoming a subscription company like Netflix or Spotify.
- Apple is already doing this in a small way through the iPhone Upgrade Programme, which lets you buy the newest iPhones SIM-free through monthly installments.
The fact that more people are hanging onto older iPhones for longer is good news for customers' wallets, but bad news for Apple's future stock price.
One of the most respected Apple analysts out there, Bernstein's Toni Sacconaghi, has said that the iPhone is at risk of turning into the iPad, and that Apple needs to move fast to head off that problem.
The iPad has experienced major shrinkage this year partly because people are hanging onto the devices they bought for longer. Even in the third quarter, when Apple finally saw a boost in iPad sales numbers, revenue from tablets was only up 2% because people were buying the cheaper versions.
According to Sacconaghi, annual iPhone sales might follow the same trend and tank by as much as 17%. That's extremely bad news for Apple, given the iPhone alone accounted for 62% of the company's revenue and profits this year.
Here's what Sacconaghi wrote, emphasis ours:
"Investors worry that the smartphone market is becoming increasingly saturated, especially at the high end, where Apple competes, and that over time, the market for iPhones will largely become a replacement market. Moreover, over time, we believe that successive generations of iPhones will likely become less differentiated (i.e. new iPhones will become "good enough" to forestall further upgrades), resulting in the elongation of replacement cycles. Such a development could materially pressure iPhone revenues; to a lesser degree, Apple has already faced these challenges in its iPad business, where annual revenues declined 37% from 2014 to 2017. We note that if the average iPhone replacement cycle were to eventually lengthen from 2.5 years (roughly where we are today) to 3 years, annual iPhone annual unit sales would ultimately fall by 17%."
The good news for Apple's stock price is that it's already sitting on one of the solutions: The iPhone Upgrade Programme. This essentially lets people buy the newest iPhones from Apple SIM-free with 20 monthly payments. If a new iPhone comes out, customers can upgrade halfway through the programme to the new phone.
The upshot of this model is that customers get a new iPhone every year and Apple gets guaranteed, ongoing payments that increase every year if people decided to swap to a new, more expensive phone.
Bernstein wants Apple to make more of this and become a subscription business. Sacconaghi calculated that the upgrade programme accounts for a "low single digit percentage" of annual iPhone sales.
If Apple can pull this off, Bernstein believes the firm's stock will be "re-rated" higher, essentially meaning investors will be willing to pay more for its shares. Currently, Apple's price to earnings (P/E) ratio is 18x. P/E ratios for software rivals are bigger, with Amazon at 289x, Alphabet at 33x and Netflix at 184x.
Here's what he said:
"We have long believed that Apple's transactional business model is a big reason why the stock trades where it does, and that the company should look to migrate to a subscription model going forward. As consumers become increasingly accustomed to paying monthly subscriptions, especially for key "tech utilities" (e.g. Netflix, Spotify, Microsoft Office 365), we could imagine Apple implementing a subscription plan of its own. In such a plan, customers could lease iPhones, iPads, Macs, and services such as iCloud and Apple Music for one "low" monthly fee, and have their hardware upgraded after a certain number of years. By moving to a subscription model, Apple would be able to lock in recurring revenue streams and freeze the length of replacement cycles, likely leading to a material re-rating of its stock's multiple."