Press "Enter" to skip to content

Is the Kiir-Machar Peace Agreement on the brink of collapse? 

BY:  Lotole Lo Luri, South Sudanese, APR/25/2019, SSN;

Given the events of the past couple of weeks, it’s fair to say that we’re witnessing a dramatic change in the political environment in South Sudan since the spiritual retreat in the Vatican that took place on the 9th and the 10th of April 2019.

As we know, His Holiness Pope Francis invited the South Sudanese leaders to spend a couple of days of prayers and personal reflection for the sake of peace in the country.

However, what followed seems like a paradoxical result to the pontiff’s endeavor. The optimism about the implementation of the revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) seems to have vanished rapidly among the signatories in the opposition.

Uncertainty regarding the entire peace agreement spread like bush-fire and dominated the political debate. In the meantime, the government and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) continued to claim progress in the implementation of the agreement contrary to the realities on the ground.

It appears the papal invitation was perceived or indeed exploited differently by each party. The government saw it as an opportunity to garner support for the R-ARCSS and most importantly; to secure funding from skeptical donors in the international community.

At least one of the signatories to the R-ARCSS, the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement in Opposition (SPLM IO) of Dr. Machar, joined the government’s efforts perhaps in an attempt to ease the restrictions imposed on its leader by the IGAD.

As for the rest of the signatories, their disappointment for not being invited to the Holy See was quite evident.

Furthermore, the invitation itself didn’t escape criticism by many South Sudanese because it was limited to leaders from two ethnicities while an entire region (Equatoria) was not represented.

By implication, it reduced the crisis in South Sudan to a conflict between the Dinka and the Nuer communities, a notion very far from the truth.

The spiritual retreat couldn’t have come at a better time for the regime and the signatories to the R-ARCSS among the opposition. The government probably regarded it as a boost to its position from an unlikely source considering the criticism of the peace deal by the Catholic bishops in their conference in Juba at the end of February 2019.

READ:  S. Sudanese opposition leaders in US for peace mobilization

The Metropolitan Archbishop of Juba, His Grace Archbishop Paulino Lukudu Loro said at the time that the Catholic bishops fear the deal is “fatally flawed and cannot bring true peace in South Sudan.”

The rare act of humility where the Pope kissed the feet of President Kiir and Dr Riek Machar asking them to embrace peace in front of the international audience, was the icing on the cake for the regime in Juba.

That gesture of goodwill by the Pope received controversial views from the South Sudanese people. The overwhelming majority welcomed the appeal for peace but were shocked by seeing the pontiff kneeling with help and kissing the feet of the two leaders.

The reason is that the two leaders remain liable to atrocities, war crimes, and crimes against humanity committed under their watch.

The majority of the people think the Pope has already done enough by inviting the leaders for the spiritual retreat and praying for peace in South Sudan. The two leaders haven’t shown any empathy or compassion towards their people to deserve papal kisses on their feet.

As expected the regime in Juba was quick to add spin to the matter in a naive attempt to rehabilitate the damaged image of the President and the government.

The opposition groups that’d signed the R-ARCSS had their share in attempting to mislead the public. Both tried to propagate the false notion that the papal kisses were an endorsement of the R-ARCSS.

The truth of the matter is that the kiss of the pontiff for peace is one thing, and endorsing the R-ARCSS is another.

Moreover, what matters is the endorsement that comes from our people in the refugee camps in the neighboring countries, in our towns and villages,  and those facing all sorts of hardships in the bushes of South Sudan.

But the optimism about the implementation of the R-ARCSS seems to have disappeared into thin air.  All the indicators are pointing in the direction of a bumpy ride from now onward.

To be accurate, the implementation of the R-ARCSS hasn’t been a smooth process from the outset. The reason it reached the current stage is that the signatories from the opposition have been continuously giving in to bullying by the government and the IGAD.

READ:  Ismail Wais and S. Sudanese activist to brief Security Council

They were too quick to go to Juba and allowed some provisions of the agreement to be skipped. Now, the situation has reached the point where further concession would mean an admission of what many people already know which is their surrender to the government.

The past couple of weeks brought up what’d long been whispered or said behind closed doors into the public domain. We’ve been reading and hearing protests against how the R-ARCSS is being implemented from low-ranking cadres of the SPLM IO for months.

Now, the top-ranking officials are the ones complaining. The contentious issues are the demilitarization of Juba and other population centers, cantonment of the government forces and those belonging to the opposition, and the formation of the national army among other issues.

All the above are behind schedule as stipulated in the R-ARCSS.

Additionally, the provisions concerning the Independent Boundary Commission (IBC) and the number of states that’re crucial to the formation of the Revitalized Transitional Government of National Unity (R-TGoNU), haven’t been implemented so far.

The failure to implement the critical provisions of the agreement within the stipulated time-frame forced the SPLM IO leader, Dr Riek Machar, to demand an extension of the pre-transitional period to six more months to allow for the completion of the process.

But the SPLM IO leader seems not to realize or has chosen not to admit that the issue isn’t insufficient time but rather the lack of political will from the government to implement the agreement in spirit and letter.

Manawa Peter Gatkuoth, one of the SPLM IO delegates in Juba, said, I quote – “Juba hasn’t been demilitarized and troops are being brought to Juba every day, and this isn’t good.”

Such a revelation is indirectly damaging to the SPLM IO leadership.

In January 2019,  the Chief of Staff of the South Sudan People’s Defense Force (SSPDF), General Gabriel Jok Riak and the Deputy Chief of Staff of the SPLM IO, General James Koang Chuol declared in a joint Press Conference their agreement to attack the National Salvation Front (NAS) forces together.

As you can see, the SPLM IO is all over the place. How could it collaborate with its arch-enemy against a fellow opposition Movement and feel safe at the same time?!

READ:  AU sets committee to monitor KDA implementation

The fundamental question though is – why’s the SPLM IO consciously allowing itself to fall into an apparent trap?! Has it already been infiltrated by the regime?!

Henry Odwar, the SPLM IO Deputy Chairman, said in a recent interview over the BBC Focus on Africa that his Movement will withdraw from the R-ARCSS should the government proceed with the formation of the R-TGoNU.

He cited that the R-TGoNU cannot be formed without the implementation of the security arrangements and a determination of the number of states.

But the government has made it clear that it’d form the new R-TGoNU as scheduled on the 12th of May 2019 with or without the SPLM IO. By then, Odwar and his colleagues may not have the luxury of leaving Juba at will.

He already had a taste of that when he complained in his early days of return to Juba of being prevented from meeting his family and friends.

While the regime is singing the bogus implementation of the R-ARCSS,  it goes on the offensive in Wau, the Yei area, and parts of Western Equatoria. Moreover, the unknown gunmen aren’t yet out of business in Juba and the entire country.

The ousting of the Sudanese President, Omar Al Bashir, from power on 11/04/2019 was bad news for Machar and the SPLM IO. Ex-President Omar Al Bashir is one of the two peace guarantors and the only backer of Machar in the region.

Meanwhile, President Kiir continues to receive the support of the second peace guarantor who’s none other than President Museveni of Uganda. The new development wouldn’t make President Kiir seek compromises as he now sees a weakening of his opponent. Instead, it’d encourage him to stick to his guns.

As the positions of the two principal signatories (Kiir and Machar) appear to have moved decidedly towards entrenchment, the collapse of the entire peace deal seems inevitable. It’s indeed imminent.

The so-called revitalized peace agreement is falling apart before the eyes of the world.

Lotole Lo Luri

[source: http://www.southsudannation.com/is-the-kiir-machar-peace-agreement-on-the-brink-of-collapse/]

Mission News Theme by Compete Themes.

Notice: Undefined index: name in /home/southsudan/public_html/wp-content/plugins/propellerads-official/includes/class-propeller-ads-anti-adblock.php on line 196